|
On May 17th I attended the annual New York Fair Elections Project
Conference. The event was held in Manhattan at the Association
of the Bar of the City of New York. This year's topic was
"Campaign Finance Reform and Communities of Color". Last year's
featured speaker was New York State Comptroller and Democratic
gubernatorial hopeful Carl McCall. This year's star was the
Reverend Al Sharpton. What a difference a year makes. Especially
in the world of politics. I was particularly interested in this
year's topic, because campaign finance reform has not been a
popular issue with many political representatives of communities
of color. Stop here to wonder who coins names like "communities
of color". It suggests a home decorating slogan from an old House
& Garden: "Towels & Throw Rugs in Complimentary Tones Can Turn
Your Bathroom into a Community of Color!" The phrase may be an
attempt to replace the often inaccurate, "minority community".
But COC? Not only is it awkward, but those who belong to
communities of color, are of course, "people of color". How far
is that from "colored people"? Which went out with separate
drinking fountains.
I was also interested in seeing Reverend Al Sharpton in an up
close speaking situation. I thought I might find him compelling,
with some over arching message that transcended his specifics.
Political meaning is sometimes a matter of essence, as well as
ideology. And one incisive aspect of a politician can be more
meaningful than the whole. I also believe people can change. But
though Reverend Al was sleeker than he was in the days when he
paraded Tawana Brawley through the streets, the only thing
compelling or meaningful about him was his awfulness.
Immediately upon hitting the dais, His Awfulness launched into
a tirade about reformers who advocate campaign finance reform
but who, in his opinion, were suspect on race. Such as Senator
John McCain. Sharpton implied strongly that McCain's campaign
finance reform interests were meant to secretly advance a racist
agenda. From that high point, Sharpton moved on to another
suspect reformer: Corey Booker in Newark, New Jersey. Corey
Booker is a black Democrat and Newark city councilman who
recently challenged incumbent Sharpe James (also black, also
a Democrat) in the Newark Mayoral race. Booker, a relative
unknown, lost. But not before running a surprisingly competitive
race, basing his campaign on two main issues: James' uneven
economic development record in Newark (big, connected, downtown
projects got jazzed, nabes got crumbs) and crime in poor
neighborhoods. One of the ways Booker addressed crime when
a councilman, was to set up camp in a RV outside of housing
projects awash in unchecked drug trade. Which made him quite
popular with besieged project residents. Booker has only lived
in Newark for 4 or 5 years. Newark born Sharpe James attacked him
as an outsider. As did Al Sharpton-- from the dais of an event
partially funded by the "Open Society Institute". According to
His Awfulness, reform leadership is only valid if it grows
from within an established, on-site political community. He
illustrated with an analogy about how when Moses died, Joshua
was picked to lead the Hebrews, as opposed to someone from
Pharaoh's army. The allusion, with its enemy army image, meshed
with Sharpton's declaration that Booker was "sent" to Newark and
bankrolled by mysterious "outside" money. Booker did receive
financial support from non Newark residents. Some with fish to
fry. But Sharpe James also received outside donations. Plenty of
them. Plus, Jersey Democratic Governor Jim McGreevey stopped by
right before the election to deliver a tax payer funded mega
stadium. And if valid reform leadership can only spring from
within an on-site political community, many Americans would
still be calling Jeff Davis' descendants "Master".
Though broader participation was regarded with suspicion,
a campaign reform concept that seemed of genuine interest to
Al Sharpton was public funding. Several New York State elected
officials who preceded Sharpton seemed similarly minded. One
called term limits "a way to keep us out of power". I truly hope
that interest in "Campaign Finance Reform And Communities of
Color" isn't based solely on a drive for government funded
campaigns. Because that's least likely to achieve reform. When
taxpayer dollars are used to fund anything, those in power can
do wonders to direct the flow. We'd be taking the power to
choose candidates out of the hands of business and entrenched
politicians-- and shifting it totally to the politicians. Far
better to stress stronger disclosure requirements and stricter
contribution and soft money limits. Plus tougher prosecution of
corrupt officials and public contractors. Death penalty, anyone?
Less draconian term limits would also help.
The New York Fair Elections Project conference made clear the
growth of Al Sharpton's political clout. The mood in the room was
decidedly kiss up. Sharpton is increasingly seen as a Democratic
king maker. But up close, it's obvious that for His Awfulness,
the world will only fall into place when he himself mounts the
throne. Let's hope he's just another megalomaniac with a wacky
dream. On a bright note, ex New York City mayoral candidate Mark Green
was in the audience and shot a zinger across the plate when
he asked Sharpton to explain, factually, just who "sent" Corey
Booker to Newark. For a moment Sharpton looked like Ralph
Kramden. As in, humma humma humma. And the food at the
conference was great. No rancid baloney for the New York City
Bar Association. At least, not at the buffet table.
Carola Von Hoffmannstahl-Solomonoff
To comment or subscribe mailto:editor@mondoqt.com
To unsubscribe send mail with "unsubscribe" as "Subject" Note: ontheqt@nycap.rr.com should no longer be used
|